Written by Dr. Nicole M. Vienna
December 28, 2021
We detected that you're using an older version of Internet Explorer. please upgrade IE 11 or later
Alternatively, you can install and use these secure and newest browsers: Chrome | Firefox | Safari for MacOS | Edge for Windows
Written by Dr. Nicole M. Vienna
December 28, 2021
If a defendant’s mental health affects their way of thinking or behaving during a trial, the judge, prosecutor, or defense attorney can seek competency to stand trial assessment. Competency to stand trial is when a defendant understands the nature of the legal proceedings against them and would be mentally competent in assisting their legal counsel regarding the case at hand. A person who is not competent to proceed may not be able to stand trial for an alleged crime due to their mental disorder or defect and its impact on their decision making or ability to comprehend what is happening in the legal proceedings. It would be a violation of their due process rights. Ultimately, competency to stand trial is determined by the judge after a review of expert mental health reports and evidence.
Nevertheless, in order to use the insanity defense for a case, the defendant must plead not guilty for a crime because of their mental illness, thus lacking culpability. Defendants using the insanity defense must suffer from a mental illness. In addition, the defendant has to prove to the court that because of their mental illness or defect, they did not understand what they have done, did not know what is right or wrong, and acted upon outside factors. This is established by the defendant as they apply the insanity defense into their case.
For example, in the aftermath of both of these rulings, the defendant must be sent to a mental health treatment facility or state hospital to receive treatment in order to stabilize their condition. In addition, to prove these defenses, the defendant must undergo an evaluation to assess their competency or sanity.
There are many differences between competency and insanity in court trials. Below, the differences are listed and explained in depth.
Competency in court refers to whether or not the defendant will participate at trial and comprehend the legal proceedings. A person’s mental state is evaluated at the time of the assessment.
On the other hand, to be declared legally insane in court implies whether or not the defendant is responsible or has culpability for their crimes due to their mental illness. The person’s mental state at the time of the crime is assessed.
Hence, a large difference between competency and sanity elucidates how competency relates to their mental state at the time of the evaluation and its impact on their ability to take part and be present in court proceedings. In contrast, sanity focuses on their mental state at the time of the crime, which is the defense their attorney will present during the trial.
Competency refers to the defendant’s present state of mind as they undergo the legal processing of their criminal case. This can be prevalent when the defendant has trouble understanding their attorney’s role in the legal proceedings or has difficulty rationally assisting their legal counsel in helping in their defense on the case.
Nevertheless, insanity is associated with the defendant’s state of mind during the crime was committed. The defendant’s mental illness may corrode with their state of mind as they enact the crime. While their mental state may be intact during their sanity evaluation, it is not relevant to their status at the time of the crime.
To qualify for competency to stand trial, an individual must:
To determine the insanity defense in a trial, a defendant must enter a plea of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI). To qualify for legal insanity, it requires that the defendant with a mental disorder is incapable of:
These particular criteria are important to consider because if the defendant does not meet any of these requirements, then they are presumed to be sane during the crime or trial. Thus, the defendant’s case will continue as someone who is mentally competent or sane.
There are a variety of court rulings that relate to competency to stand trial and the insanity defense.
The court rulings related to competency to stand trial includes:
Furthermore, the court rulings relevant to the insanity defense constitutes with:
When the defendant is declared legally incompetent to stand in the trial, the trial itself is suspended. The defendant will be sent to the Department of State Hospitals or a facility where they will receive proper treatment for their mental illness. The treatments are meant to stabilize the individual’s condition until they are competent enough to return to trial, depending on the progression of their treatment.
Alternatively, when the defendant is declared legally insane, their trial outcome will typically receive the same sentence as someone who was “guilty,” but the defendant is supposed to start their sentence in a mental health facility and might be transferred to prison after treatment is completed. Alternatively, they could spend the sentence in a state hospital under professional treatment. Therefore, the defendant would be sentenced to a psychiatric hospital rather than prison due to their mental illness or defect.
Although there may be some similarities between competency and insanity, there is a prominent difference that should be considered when approached with these types of cases. For example, competency relates to whether or not the defendant can comprehend and understand what is going on in the legal process and their role in the case. On the other hand, insanity corresponds with how the mental state of a defendant affected their way of thinking when they committed the crime.
If you would like to schedule a consultation with Dr. Vienna to learn more about competency to stand trial and not guilty by reason of insanity, contact our office at (626) 709-3494.
Please be aware that this is not a secure email network under HIPAA guidelines. Do not submit any personal or private information unless you are authorized and have voluntarily consented to do so. We are not liable for any HIPAA violations. Understand that if you email us, you are agreeing to the use of an unsecured method and understand that all replies will be sent in the same fashion, which you are hereby authorizing.
By checking this box you hereby agree to hold Vienna Psychological Group, Inc., including its doctors and affiliates, harmless from any hacking or any other unauthorized use of your personal information by outside parties.